Skip to main content

Impact of Water on Animal Agriculture



Water shortage in the U.S. is a big deal right now. California's in a seemingly hopeless drought, and the people all around are blaming it on the animal food industry. In animal agriculture, water is used for the animals' intake, cleaning barns, irrigation for crops to feed the animals, cleaning carcasses and finally, at the consumers' end, cooking food. That's a lot of water! Nathan Runkle, founder and president of Mercy for Animals, makes big arguments about how much water the industry uses. He says that to make one pound of beef 1800 gallons of water are used, and to produce a gallon of milk 880 gallons of water are used(1)! When I read this I was astonished. But then I realized even though he claimed to have gotten the information from National Geographic, he didn't say how old the numbers were. A little more research and I found that his numbers, while possibly true at some point in time, were definitely not accurate today.

Carl Bailik, from the Wall Street Journal, says that even though numbers estimated for a water use have been conflicting, they for sure have decreased(2). A study came out in the 1970's by Thomas Aldrich that said to make a burger and fries it took about a swimming pool's amount of water. This put the cattle industry into a frantic scramble to lower their water usage. It was not something that had been regulated intensely at the time, especially not in the animal agriculture industry. Finally in 1991, Marcia Krieth showed that the amount of water to produce a burger was only 616 gallons. In 1993, the Animal Science Department at University of California-Davis found that only 441 gallons of water are needed to produce a pound of boneless beef (3). Paul Wegner from the California Farm Bureau says that agriculture is an industry truly essential to life. He also states that we must talk about what we can do to fix the problem, not just how bad the problem is (4). We must always keep in mind that even though water is used, it is also put back into the environment. The water cycle still goes on. The problem is, it may not be happening as fast as we would like it to. I believe, however, that as the animal agriculture industry grows, the efficiency will increase (as it already is doing) and we will find ways through recycling, desalination, and other techniques to keep our water cycle working.

1. "Can Eating Less Meat Save California?" Runkle, Nathan. The San Diego Union Tribune. 9 April 2015. Accessed 23 Sept. 2015.

2. "How Much Water Goes Into a Burger? Studies Show Different Answers." Bailik, Carl. The Wall Street Journal. May 2006. Accessed 23 Sept. 2015.

3. "University of California-Davis Highlights" UC-D. Oltjen, Dr. J.W. Aug. 1993. Accessed 6 Oct. 2015.

4. "Let's Discuss Water Honestly." Wegner, Paul. California Farm Bureau Federation. April 2015. Accessed 23 Sept. 2015. 

Comments

  1. Are there any possible way to lower the amount of water usage or is it about as low as it can get?

    ReplyDelete
  2. While it may be hard to lower the current water usage, it is not impossible. Scientists are looking into ways of to perform efficient desalination to convert salt water into freshwater. As an individual you can do your part by taking shorter showers, watering your lawn less, minimizing the amounts of water used for cleaning, and other things of that nature.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Does Meat Cause Cancer?

So, in light of the recent chaotic news about meat being a potential carcinogen I have been asked to do a post about it. First off, let’s talk about what the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) really said. The IARC ranks the potential of cancer causing agents in 5 categories 1 : ·          Group 1: Carcinogenic to humans ·          Group 2A: Probably carcinogenic to humans ·          Group 2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans ·          Group 3: Unclassifiable as to carcinogenicity in humans ·          Group 4: Probably not carcinogenic to humans Now, according to the press release, red meat is considered as Group 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans. Now, please don’t stop reading here and thinking your suspicions were confirmed.  According to the arti...
Alright, let’s face it. It’s a new year. And if you’re in college in the US, then most of you are going back to school this week. But whether you’re a mom, a college kid, or a single adult, we ALL have to grocery shop. With the New Year I know many people have resolutions to eat healthier, cleaner, or maybe to just cut back on spending so much money on food! In 2013 people spent over $717 million on food **at home (no restaurants)** in the US alone. I imagine that with the trends in organic and natural foods rising, we will surpass $730 million mark if we haven’t already (find the charts here ). So, welcome to my second post in the series of The Savvy Shopper’s Guide series. You can read the first post here . Let me start by clearing up some confusion. I think people get confused by the labels “natural,” “naturally raised,” and “organic.” Some people I have spoken to, thought they were all very similar or meant the same thing. They are not the same thing. To be organic, produce...

The Savvy Shopper's Guide to: Organic Food

Hey everyone! I am going to begin a 4 post series called the Savvy Shoppers Guide. It will include facts on organic, locally grown, all natural, and free range products that you buy. This way you will be able to make savvy shopping decisions when you purchase groceries! You will also be able to understand why we have conventional agriculture and why we need to continue with conventional ag even if you choose to opt for non-conventional. Today we will be covering organic food items. So first I would like to say that I do not believe that there are any food safety advantages that come from producing organic foods. In fact, in 2002 Alex Avery, research director for the Center of Global Food Issues stated that natural and organic foods are eight times more likely to be recalled than conventionally produced foods 1 . The USDA has found that drug residues in ALL beef, not just organic, to be virtually zero 2 . Of course all foods from animals naturally have hormones. While organicall...