Skip to main content

Hormones in the Animal Agriculture Industry.

Hey everyone! I just would like to preface this by saying that over the next few days I will have the amazing opportunity to meet and interact with Temple Grandin. Dr. Grandin is an amazing influential character in the animal industry. She specializes in animal welfare. If you do not know who she is, please take a second and look her up before reading this blog.

Now, onto the important matter here. Hormones are a hot topic in the food animal circles, whether you’re a consumer, producer, retailer, etc. I want to state that I do not want to tell you how to think. I really want to give people the facts and maybe a small part of my opinion. Before we can truly believe something, we must first know the hard facts. Since this post is such a big deal, I will start by stating my opinion so that you know where I stand and can determine what parts of this blog are facts.  I believe that hormones in animal agriculture are safe to humans, increase productivity, and are efficient to the industry. However from an animal welfare standpoint I do not agree with use of added hormones.

Let me start with the basics. The first thing you need to know is the difference between beta-agonists and hormones. A beta-agonist is basically a non-hormonal compound which releases epinephrine (adrenaline) and converts extra energy to muscle, in turn increasing growth efficiency. These animals, being pumped with adrenaline are increasingly skittish, jumpy, and stressed. It would probably be similar to someone who is on methamphetamines (this is my comparison, not a fact). In fact, Dr. Grandin found so many problems in packing plants when a beta-agonist called Zilmax© was introduced that all major packing plants quit using it. Read that story here. Beta-agonists are used in large scale cattle and pork growing stages. Smaller feedlots tend to avoid beta-agonists. Hormones are natural to all animals, so that when added to the diet, implanted, or injected into the animal, it does not frighten them like high dosages of epinephrine do. However increased dosages of hormones to enhance production efficiency. Hormones are not used in pork or poultry products.

In dairy cattle, the most common hormone that we hear about is bovine-somatotropin (bST). It has been proven that this hormone, which increases milk production, is completely safe for human consumption. The reasoning behind this is that bST is a protein based hormone and is biologically inactive in the human body1. First, any residue from this hormone is mostly eliminated by pasteurization of the dairy product. Second, any bit of hormone left in the product, once consumed, is completely digested by the human gastro-intestinal tract and is turned into amino acids. This makes the hormone completely safe to consume and causes no increased growth or faster puberty in humans. However, in 1999 the European Union banned use of bST due to animal welfare concerns. The U.S. is the only major exporter to use bST in dairy cattle. Read about the court case on bST here.

As much as I hate to admit it, I think that the animal agriculture industry has made a mistake allowing hormones to be our easy way out. I believe that the use of hormones and beta-agonists are economically motivated. I also believe that if the industry chose to select for better genetics, larger animals, leaner animals, then we wouldn’t need the use of hormones. The problem with this is that it is expensive, takes a long time, and is not as efficient. Use of these additives is cheap, (although the people making them sure do make a lot of money) it helps produce more meat with less animals and less feed, and the results are somewhat immediate. All of these hormones and beta-agonists have also been approved by the FDA when given in the correct dosages. Producers will be hard-set in their current ways and unlikely to change especially when what they’re doing is government approved.

I would like to hit on one last thing before I go. As consumers we need to educate ourselves and our fellow consumers. I want to point out that sometimes we make things harder on ourselves. While worrying about what meat is the best to pick, keep in mind that NO poultry producer uses antibiotics after the second day of life. It is illegal. Hormones are NOT added in poultry or pork. This is not to say that any producer or retailer is lying to you. Just be aware that there truly is no difference in “antibiotic free”

chicken and conventional chicken. Please share with your friends and help them become savvy shoppers and consumers. Let me know what you think by commenting below!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Does Meat Cause Cancer?

So, in light of the recent chaotic news about meat being a potential carcinogen I have been asked to do a post about it. First off, let’s talk about what the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) really said. The IARC ranks the potential of cancer causing agents in 5 categories 1 : ·          Group 1: Carcinogenic to humans ·          Group 2A: Probably carcinogenic to humans ·          Group 2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans ·          Group 3: Unclassifiable as to carcinogenicity in humans ·          Group 4: Probably not carcinogenic to humans Now, according to the press release, red meat is considered as Group 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans. Now, please don’t stop reading here and thinking your suspicions were confirmed.  According to the arti...
Alright, let’s face it. It’s a new year. And if you’re in college in the US, then most of you are going back to school this week. But whether you’re a mom, a college kid, or a single adult, we ALL have to grocery shop. With the New Year I know many people have resolutions to eat healthier, cleaner, or maybe to just cut back on spending so much money on food! In 2013 people spent over $717 million on food **at home (no restaurants)** in the US alone. I imagine that with the trends in organic and natural foods rising, we will surpass $730 million mark if we haven’t already (find the charts here ). So, welcome to my second post in the series of The Savvy Shopper’s Guide series. You can read the first post here . Let me start by clearing up some confusion. I think people get confused by the labels “natural,” “naturally raised,” and “organic.” Some people I have spoken to, thought they were all very similar or meant the same thing. They are not the same thing. To be organic, produce...

The Savvy Shopper's Guide to: Organic Food

Hey everyone! I am going to begin a 4 post series called the Savvy Shoppers Guide. It will include facts on organic, locally grown, all natural, and free range products that you buy. This way you will be able to make savvy shopping decisions when you purchase groceries! You will also be able to understand why we have conventional agriculture and why we need to continue with conventional ag even if you choose to opt for non-conventional. Today we will be covering organic food items. So first I would like to say that I do not believe that there are any food safety advantages that come from producing organic foods. In fact, in 2002 Alex Avery, research director for the Center of Global Food Issues stated that natural and organic foods are eight times more likely to be recalled than conventionally produced foods 1 . The USDA has found that drug residues in ALL beef, not just organic, to be virtually zero 2 . Of course all foods from animals naturally have hormones. While organicall...