So, in light of the recent chaotic news about meat being a
potential carcinogen I have been asked to do a post about it. First off, let’s
talk about what the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)
really said. The IARC ranks the potential of cancer causing agents in 5
categories1:
·
Group 1: Carcinogenic to humans
·
Group 2A: Probably carcinogenic to humans
·
Group 2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans
·
Group 3: Unclassifiable as to carcinogenicity in
humans
·
Group 4: Probably not carcinogenic to humans
Now, according to the press release, red meat is considered as
Group 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans. Now, please don’t stop reading here
and thinking your suspicions were confirmed.
According to the article this was based on “limited evidence” after the review of science literature from ten
different countries “convened by the IARC Monographs Programme.” Processed meat
(hot dogs, ham, corned beef etc.) is classified in the Group 1. This is based
on “sufficient evidence.” 2 Dr.
Christopher Wild, director of IARC, said that even with these findings “at the
same time, red meat has nutritional value.” Head of the Monographs Programme
Dr. Kurt Straif, stated that the risk of developing colorectal cancer due to
the consumption of processed meat remains small. What the IARC released is very
confusing.
Notice that the decision was made based on the review of
literature. From up to 20 years ago2. Betsy Booren from the North
American Meat Institute (NAMI) stated that during the meeting with the IARC it
was clear that the panelists were pushing for a specific result despite the
old, “self-reported” data. Let’s look at another problem, the IARC has rated
practically everything we do as carcinogenic.
Group 1:
·
Breathing air
·
Sitting near a sun-filled window
·
Drinking wine (or any alcoholic beverages)
·
Mineral oils
·
Working with leather (dust from leather)
·
Having the occupation of a painter
·
Eating Chinese style fish
·
Woodworking
Group 2A
·
Having a career as a hair dresser
·
Having a career doing shiftwork
·
Eating grilled food
·
Glass manufacturing
Group 2B
·
Drinking coffee
·
Applying aloe vera after a sunburn
·
Coconut oil
·
Carpentry
·
Welding3
Here’s the deal. EVERYONE HAS TO BREATHE. According to them,
we all have the same potential of getting cancer based on breathing air. My
city may not be as “polluted” as yours or vice versa, but I also eat meat,
apply aloe vera, drink coffee, eat fish and grilled and fried foods, sit in the
sun, and use coconut oil. And that isn’t a complete list folks. I’m surprised I’m
not dead yet based on those “facts”!
A petition filed by the Physicians Committee for Responsible
Medicine (PCRM), calls on the USDA to stop distributing hot dogs and processed
meats to students through the National School Lunch Program. This would cause
the lunch programs to become increasingly expensive, and a lot of them are
already struggling. NAMI issued a statement in response to this petition. They
said that PRCM is using the IARC report “as another tool to force meat off the
plates of schoolchildren.” In America, we like to offer choices. NAMI also
states that if you no longer want your child to eat fresh or processed meats,
then let them take advantage of the vegetarian options that are ALWAYS
available. If you choose to make that decision, then that is great, but don’t
take options away from kids that the World Health Organization approves in a
balanced diet. NAMI stands by the nutritional value of meat4, as do
I, and so should you.
Let me know in the comments below what you think about
eating meat, and whether or not you will continue to support meat in our school
systems, or if you have any suggestions on what you would like to read about
next!
1.
Gabbett, Rita J. "Meatingplace.com." Meatingplace.com.
N.p., 26 Oct. 2015. Web. 31 Oct. 2015.
<http://meatingplace.com/Industry/News/Details/62196?loginSuccess>.
2.
"IARC Monographs Evaluate the Consumption
of Red Meat and Processed Meat." (2015): n. pag. World Health
Organization, 26 Oct. 2015. Web. 31 Oct. 2015.
<https://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2015/pdfs/pr240_E.pdf>.
3.
"IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of
Carcinogenic Risks to Humans."IARC Monographs-classifications.
IARC, n.d. Web. 01 Nov. 2015.
<http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/latest_classif.php>.
4.
Keefe, Lisa M. "Meatingplace.com." Meatingplace.com.
N.p., 30 Oct. 2015. Web. 31 Oct. 2015. <http://www.meatingplace.com/Industry/News/Details/62317>.
You have as much possibility as getting cancer from simply being alive, as eating meat is essentially what those companies are trying to say. My child will NOT attend public school if they take away meat from lunch programs.
ReplyDelete