Skip to main content

High-yield Agriculture

What do you think of when you hear the words farmer or farming? 

Do you see a little red barn with the typical farm animals? One pig, one work horse, a cow, maybe a few chickens and a barn cat right?

Now, what do you think of when you hear factory farming? Industrial agriculture?

That's a completely different picture right? Which one would you go for? 

Today, society wants to go backwards. To simpler times, where technology isn't running the world. Where a small farm to feed your family and neighborhood would be enough. That idea isn't realistic though. For an agriculture advocate, someone who understands and supports modern agriculture, they would go for what the media calls "factory farming." They want the huge towering industry where technology rules and scares the living fire out of society. But what is it that scares people? Is it the technology? The concern for animal welfare? The speed and efficiency with which these farms are producing food? Let's go back to 1960, where cattle roamed, pigs roamed, and horses helped till the land. Dr. Gary Smith, a professor at Texas A&M University wrote that if we went back to the technology level of the 1960s, we would need 15-20 million more acres than we use now for farming(1). There would also be an enormous amount of environmental impact due to runoff of manure. Housing dairy cattle, finishing cattle, and hogs gives us the opportunity to reduce the impact of feces. In a housing unit for these animals, it creates a smaller space so that feces is collected more rapidly and frequently. It then can be composted, which helps inactivate viruses, and obviously reduces environmental concerns. Back in 1960 there were over 180 million people in the U.S. alone. Today, there are over 320 million people in the U.S. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) says that the population will increase and with the population, the demand for animal food products will increase by 60% (2). Jeff Simmons, president of Elanco says we'll have to produce more with less because we are already over-using our resources.  High-yield agriculture is definitely needed. Norman Borlaug never stopped trying to convince people that the technology used in agriculture is what keeps the industry sustainable. If we didn't use modern technology and science, we would never be able to feed the whole world. Some people would be okay with that, but I think many farmers and people of agriculture have a moral and ethical problem with that. Just like Borlaug said, “They said you should just let the human population die off to a fraction of what it is, otherwise you’re creating a lifeboat that will sink with too many piling on. But I think starvation isn’t a very good way to control the population. I see a deep-seated ethical problem with that.”(3) By continuing to increase efficiency, productivity and public acceptance of high-yield agriculture we just might be able to feed the world.

1."Feeding the World by Use of Agriulture Technology I." Smith, Gary C. Where Food Comes From Newsletter. January 2011. Accessed 13 Sept. 2015.


2. "Dow and Elanco Join Forces to Increase Meat and Milk Production." Dow Agrisciences. 18 Sept. 2014. Accessed 14 Sept. 2015.


3. "Why do So Many People Suffer From Food Insecurity?" Smith, Gary C. Where Food Comes From Newsletter.  16 April 2011. Accessed 24 Sept. 2015.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Truth About Uncured Meats

When you’re at the grocery store, do you ever feel like all you see is greenwashed logos and brands? It’s hard to find anything that’s not “all natural” or non-GMO. We’ve talked about labels before, and how they can be misleading. For example, meat is always gluten free, but now tons of meat products have a gluten-free label on them. Some consumers likely don’t realize that all meat has always been gluten free, and they pay extra for that little banner. One of the most misleading labels-in my opinion at least-is the “uncured” label on processed meats. What do you think of when you see that label on your lunch meat or bacon? I assume  most people, when they see this label, think Oh, there’s not as many chemicals! It’s gotta be better. More natural. Maybe even healthier! The good news is, I was really impressed with how accurate the first few Google results were when I looked up the differences between uncured and cured bacon. I saw only a few statements that uncured bacon ...

Does Meat Cause Cancer?

So, in light of the recent chaotic news about meat being a potential carcinogen I have been asked to do a post about it. First off, let’s talk about what the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) really said. The IARC ranks the potential of cancer causing agents in 5 categories 1 : ·          Group 1: Carcinogenic to humans ·          Group 2A: Probably carcinogenic to humans ·          Group 2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans ·          Group 3: Unclassifiable as to carcinogenicity in humans ·          Group 4: Probably not carcinogenic to humans Now, according to the press release, red meat is considered as Group 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans. Now, please don’t stop reading here and thinking your suspicions were confirmed.  According to the arti...

The Impact of Food Waste and How You Can Reduce It!

Food waste is a major concern all around the world. It comes to play in political topics such as agricultural sustainability, economic matters, environmental concerns and feeding the world. The agriculture industry has its fair share of food waste, but so does every individual I know (at least here in America). I know I am definitely guilty. The problem has become so large that Congresswoman Chellie Pingree wants to propose legislation to help address the problem on our home turf. Pingree says that “40% of food in the U.S. is wasted.” 1 That is a ridiculous amount for such an advanced country to be losing. Pingree also said that there are four levels to our food waste problem: 1)                        restaurant and retail 2)                      institutions (school,assist...